“We have answers that don’t answer, explanations that don’t explain,
conclusions that don’t conclude.”
Fred
Hampton
“Everybody walks right by like they’re
safe or something; they don’t know.”
Jackson Browne
We are SO being
lied to.
It seems the
initial confusion in the Lame Stream Media about “there is a suspect in
custody, no, wait, there isn’t a suspect in custody” that was of course
initially given that ridiculous “fog of war” early misunderstanding/rigamarole
for the dumbed down sheeple has this at its core: there WAS a person of interest/suspect in custody. He was hurt in the blasts. He was in the hospital. Everything you initially heard reported was
true.
On April 16th
Fox News and Fox Boston report the Saudi POI’s name, Abdul Rahman Ali Alharbi,
and the fact that he was now being deported due to “national security
concerns.” But then the marching orders
came down, because on April 17th Obama, due to be in Boston, cancelled that visit to meet with
Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Saud al-Faisal at the White House to discuss the
conflict in Syria. (Riiiiiiiiiiiiight.) This meeting was not on Obama’s public
schedule, and he went so far as to tell the FBI to stand down while he met with
Saudi officials.
Whereupon Fox
disappeared the entire story from all Fox and Fox affiliate websites just as if
it never existed, beginning the “we’ve got to be careful what we report in the
early confusion” campaign that’s still in force, as you’ll see.
Luckily, there
are always those paying attention that screen grab everything because here is
20-year-old Abdul Rahman Ali Alharbi, former student at the New England School
of English, believed to have entered the country on a student visa. (Quick,
someone contact J. Michael Springmann to run some protocols for us on
this.) Inside joke but if you look up
Springmann’s name you’ll discover a whole ‘nother branch office of the rabbit
hole awaiting you.
The Associated
Press reported early Tuesday that FBI agents left Alharbi’s Reserve House digs
carrying brown paper bags, plastic garbage bags, and a duffel. Evidently they just really like used
clothes.
Of no particular
note I’m sure is the fact that Fox’s second largest shareholder is Saudi Prince
Al-Waleed Bin Talal. Also of interest
is the fact that the Alharbi family is evidently very important in Saudi
Arabia, engaged in engineering and construction (sound familiar?) Curiously there was also an Alharbi taking
up residence at GITMO some time ago.
So was this guy
being set up as a cut-out, sheep-dipped, a limited hangout? A Manchurian candidate? A patsy-in-the-making before daddy and a
pair of Princes came to the rescue? Or
was he all of the above and now “protected” by the ones in those shadows we
keep bumping up against here? Will he
at some later date be sent out to emerge again in all his mysterious
usefulness?
Finally, a
visibly irritated Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano refused to
answer South Carolina Congressman Jeff Duncan’s questions today (Apr.18th)
about a possible deportation of a Saudi national questioned as a witness (now
downgraded from suspect you’ll notice) in the Boston Marathon bombings. Napolitano called the Congessman’s question
“so full of misstatements and misapprehension that it’s just not worthy of an
answer.”
“We have someone
who’s being deported due to national security concerns,” Duncan said during the
Capitol Hill hearing Thursday. “We’ve
got this guy who was there, we know he was there…and yet you’re going to deport
him? We’re going to remove him from the
scene?”
“If I might, I
am unaware of anyone who is being deported for national security concerns at
all related to Boston,” Napolitano said.
“He is being
deported,” Duncan countered.
Napolitano said
as she understood it, the man was not technically a POI or suspect and “this is
an example of why it’s so important to let law enforcement do its job.”
“I want them to
do their job,” Duncan said. “Wouldn’t
you agree with me that it’s negligent for us an an American administration to
deport someone who was reported at the scene of the bombings and we’re going to
deport him, not to be able to question him anymore?”
“I am not going
to answer that question it is so full of misstatements and misapprehension that
it’s just not worthy of an answer. We
will provide you with accurate information as it becomes available.”
No comments:
Post a Comment