“TO SIN BY
SILENCE WHEN WE SHOULD PROTEST MAKES COWARDS OUT OF MEN.” – Ella Wheeler Wilcox
“One of the
saddest lessons of history is this: if we’ve been bamboozled long enough, we
tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We’re no longer interested in
finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It’s simply too painful
to acknowledge, even to ourselves, that we’ve been taken. Once you give a
charlatan power over you, you almost never get it back.” – Carl Sagan, The Demon-Haunted World
Sit down
everyone. I have a somewhat convoluted
tale to weave, here in the shadow of yet another November 22nd. And the end, I leave it for you, dear reader,
to decide whether or not the lineage of this same cabal, this Order, could be
responsible for the death of the last president that was determined to inform
the populace and what follows here. I
know for me, that answer, of tragic catastrophe and consequence, came a long time ago.
We are
talking specifically now, of course, about the wikileaks widespread release of
the Clinton/Podesta emails, which has erupted into the scandal known as “Pizzagate,”
which appears to uncover a widespread D.C. underground of pedophile rings and
child trafficking factions with concrete links to both the Clinton Foundation
and John Podesta, among many, many others.
See all previous links here, for starters: http://mcmmadnessnews.blogspot.com/2016/11/breaking-witchcraft.html
This video
is also a fantastic, quick summary of the highlights (lowlights) so far: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ggvQdZXMGLw
I was
approached rather aggressively on other sites’ comments boards that I frequent
for daring to even bring this subject up initially (at least in the way I did.) In the course of those dialogues at one point
and seemingly out of nowhere the vaunted Peter Levenda (Sinister Forces, Unholy
Alliance) even showed up to challenge me directly on my assertions. The fact that one of, if not the, pre-eminent
esoteric/parapolitical researchers operating today, showed up on a comments
board to openly confront me over the validity of these allegations should speak
volumes in and of itself. The fact that
he would do so from a position of such stark, willful, calculated ignorance
tells another story entirely. The background: (see all comments for the
unfolding narrative – I comment using Robin Rucker on Auticulture btw.)
and for even
more escalating, and truly frightening, craziness: https://auticulture.wordpress.com/2016/11/15/back-to-the-kubrickon-kek-trump-god-manufacturing-via-the-internet-the-implicate-order-of-the-id/#comments
I initially
proposed the relationship between he, his co-author (the extremely suspicious) Tom DeLonge, and John
Podesta was a curious one and was a subject that was suddenly meeting at the
strangest imaginable corners of ufology and pedophilia, especially given the
recent wikileaks email headlines. I said
this deserved looking into (if for nothing more than synchronicity’s
sake.) I also brought up the fact that
Levenda had, in another protracted dialogue that was the subject of a lengthy
post on Jasun Horusley’s Auticulture, taken a rather laissez faire
attitude/stance on the subject of whether or not Aleister Crowley ever actively
engaged in human (and/or child) sacrifice.
Levenda’s take was he most certainly did not. Certain inside sources and factions within
the DOD in their extensive research would beg to differ. (http://rigorousintuition.blogspot.com/2005/08/doom-days.html)
Not to
mention Crowley’s own writings, which Levenda asserts were merely a “joke” or
Crowley’s bizarre sense of “humor.”
See this passage from Levenda responding to Jasun Horusley:
"The passage from the diary you mentioned also has to be taken in context. AC wrote a lot of prose like that. His mission was to shock people and to "brand" himself. He always wrote with an audience in mind...(etc.)"
from here:
https://auticulture.wordpress.com/2016/07/02/crowley-ritual-abuse-levenda/
See this passage from Levenda responding to Jasun Horusley:
"The passage from the diary you mentioned also has to be taken in context. AC wrote a lot of prose like that. His mission was to shock people and to "brand" himself. He always wrote with an audience in mind...(etc.)"
from here:
https://auticulture.wordpress.com/2016/07/02/crowley-ritual-abuse-levenda/
Ironically,
this is the EXACT stance that those caught communicating in pedo codes openly
in emails in the Pizzagate affair are now adopting. The art, the emails, the wording, hey, can’t
all you people take a joke? We’re only joking about fucking children, c’mon!! Nothing to see here, move along. Get a life. Can't you see we're only artistic hipsters? None of you are cool enough to get it. This is all just a mistake of "context," got it now?
25,000
amateur researchers on Reddit and a similar number on 4chan parsed the
wikileaks releases and found there was MUCH to see, putting the Pizzagate pervs
in scrambling defense mode, which makes the timing of Levenda’s protests all
the more curious. “Methinks thou doth
protest too much?”
Couple all of this
with the NYTimes caterwauling of “Fake News!” and the Reddit bleachbit-ing of
the entire Pizzagate subreddit, and you’ve got not only a story, but a scandal
of increasingly historic proportions.
So, as you
can see, there has been a LOT going on, as we all find ourselves smack dab in
the middle of what is, essentially, a war.
Chris
Knowles of Secret Sun is the first to have alerted me to the fact of the FBI
taking over the NYPD investigation of the entire scope of Pizzagate, lock,
stock, and two smoking barrels. Which comes
as absolutely no surprise historically when you remember what happened with the
infamous Finders case.
There it was the
CIA stepping in and commandeering a State (Florida) investigation that
threatened to overturn the applecart of federal interest in and command of
child abuse and trafficking rings centered in this country and branching out
into Mexico and abroad (Europe) in 1987.
The final wording on federal documentation that went straight to the
Tallahassee, Fla. PD: “The investigation into the activity of the
Finders has become a CIA internal matter. The MPD (D.C.) police report has been
classified SECRET and is not available for review. No further information will
be available. No further action will be taken.”
Why do I feel
like a similarly worded preemptive statement now lies on all the desks at the NYPD,
courtesy of the FBI? The M.O. is identical, and points to the fingerprints of
larger forces using these federal agencies as blunt-force objects, tools, of
their dominion and overall black control operations.
Bottom line,
you either believe this is the biggest story on the planet, or you don’t. “When
pressed, Jasun asked me if I did not believe that there was an international
cabal of Satan-worshipping child abusers and I had to tell him no…..We met
John Podesta last year, not this year, and not in proximity with the email
disclosures. I am not certain what you mean by
what you find suspicious in the emails, or where there is the intimation of
pedophile rings, etc…” : Levenda.
Uh, Peter, are
you even paying attention at all, or is that your confirmation bias
showing? Are you truly the investigator
and researcher you claim to be, or are you simply buying hook, line, and sinker
the NYTimes screaming “fake news” and other blatantly Orwellian proclamations?
You’ve already philosophically embraced the
tactical wording of “witch hunt,” (among others such as the Spanish
Inquisition, which I suppose makes me Torquemada or something) and which puts
you squarely in league with the likes of Reddit. Which is, right now, if you are a real truth seeker,
not an enviable place to be, and that’s an understatement.
Although it
may seem like it, I by no means am singling Mr. Peter Levenda out. His stance and mindset is merely the most
dangerous one at this point of censorship and widespread governmental cracking
down on the dissemination of any information not deemed worthy, politically
correct, or “official.” And, as you can
see, this mindset is growing and is completely at odds with any open and transparent
investigation. You simply can’t
“disappear” the research of some 25,000 amateur sleuths tracking down lead
after lead in a very sensitive and crucially important area of social and moral
imperative and not expect some kind of blowback.
You know you’ve hit the jackpot and are
treading on some very important toes when Google, Facebook, Twitter, Youtube,
the NYTimes, Washington Post, and Reddit (to name just a few) are now colluding
with the federal government to keep this under wraps. We are seeing 100% full damage control from
all quarters, and a transparent agenda in full flight.
Reddit, et
al are banning this. I’m continuing
it. And I’m not alone. Far from it.
This reaction, this attitude of denial and screaming “fake news” are the
first real steps to a State-controlled Media; the most blatant examples we have
seen so far. At this point I can’t
separate the mindset and language of Aquino, Levenda, and the False Memory
Syndrome Foundation, and that constitutes a tragedy of monumental proportions. But even as we speak here, other sites like
CorbettReport and Voat are vowing to republish and continue the investigatory
streams.
The fact
remains that something has been bubbling behind the scenes, breaking down the
walls of this façade, since at least late June of this year, when stellar
researcher Wayne Madsen published this woefully overlooked piece: http://www.waynemadsenreport.com/articles/20160628_1/print
We’ve seen
John Podesta’s cannibalistic artwork on the walls of his office in numerous
newspaper and magazine pieces.
This from
Time: “On the wall in his office at Hillary Clinton’s Brooklyn headquarters,
campaign chairman John Podesta has an oil painting on loan from his lobbyist
brother, who is an avid art collector. The image shows two men hunched over a
dining room table, bearing knives and forks. On the table lays a man in a suit,
who looks vaguely like Podesta. “It’s better to be the guy with the fork,”
Podesta quips to his colleagues, if they ask about the image, “than the guy on
the table.”
And now this.
From politico.com, noting where numerous D.C. A-listers go on
vacation. John Podesta, Center For
American Progress: “I am going to my condo in Truckee (Calif.) like I do every
year – will sit on my porch and do conference calls 50 feet from where the
Donner party ate each other.”
How much
more damning info do we need to glean that this constitutes a fetish at least
and a dangerous, deviant pathology at worst?
And since we
seem to be on a theme here, let’s see what the CEO of Reddit has links to on
his twitter account. Once again, we’re
seeing similar-minded individuals following similar-minded pursuits.
If there’s
nothing here, why do these “persons of interest” post shots of kill rooms?
If there's nothing to this, why do they
post shots of themselves wearing t-shirts with “I love children” on them?
Why do they
post “self-portraits” like this?
Why did
Besta pizza have a logo that (barely) concealed an FBI-identified pedophile
symbol within it?
That was
quickly removed?
Why do the
Madeleine McCann efit sketches released to the public in 2013 by UK authorities
show remarkable resemblance to Anthony Weiner, the Podesta Brothers, and
Ghislaine Maxwell, all of whom have now been physically placed to within 1/3 of
a mile of the Praia da Luz resort on the EXACT day/night that Madeleine
disappeared? Most importantly, does this
place Madeleine squarely within the sharpened jaws of the Jeffrey Epstein
network? (Wherever Maxwell went, it was surely at the behest and instruction of
Epstein. This is a given.)
If there is nothing to all this, then how to explain the wording in this email to John Podesta from a Susan Sandler?
"The realtor found a handkerchief (I think it has a map that seems pizza-related. Is it yours? They can send it if you want..."
What could this POSSIBLY be except code for something else? What kind of psychological contortions does a person have to go through to make this wording seem anything remotely close to normal? Is this SUSPICIOUS enough for everyone?
Tell me what exactly, in this one statement alone, doesn't justify enough warrants and subpoenas to choke a horse to be issued by federal authorities and/or grand juries on every inch of every property of everyone concerned in this whole sordid mess?
Do we live in a just world, or do we not?
I also post
this here since this was the last thing put up on Reddit before ALL the
Pizzagate info was banished. This almost certainly was the final straw. I also place it here to archive it in one
more location just in case.
On The Legitimacy Of This
Investigation (with an important message to fellow journalists I know are
lurking on this sub)
submitted 3 hours ago * by
Throw-Away-Journo - announcement
Edit: this is a throw-away account, I
will not be using it further nor answering any questions
Edit2: impossible to get such a piece
passed my editor, so I'm leaving it here for people to distribute (send it to
journos if you have the emails, it will silently resonate)
We are told the work on /r/Pizzagate
(and other message boards) is illegitimate because people are rushing to
conclusions, or because they are being paranoid, or partisan (despite so many
of different political complexions provably working together). The subtitle
here of course is that the State is solely legitimate to suspect and
investigate crimes.
But what if the State itself is, in a
systemic way, responsible for said crimes? It wouldn't be a first; after all,
democide (death by government, a word surprisingly absent from conversations)
was the first cause of non-natural deaths in the 20th century. Whether one is
from the right, left, or center, one cannot deny government is the number one
abuser, enslaver and serial-killer in History. We may honestly disagree on the
ways to eradicate the phenomenon, or we may regret that fact, but we cannot
deny it.
So, if the State itself is committing
crimes, it is the people's sovereign and sacred duty to expose it. Those who
understand this truth best tend to become journalists. At least, that's what
drove me to the profession.
Now specifically on this work. First,
there is context; institutional child abuse is already a common-knowledge
phenomenon. From the Presidio affair to Jimmy Savile and the BBC, or from the
Vatican's historic involvement in covering-up pedophilia to US legislators'
documented trips on the "Lolita Express", from the questions still
surrounding Dutroux to the Hampstead doubts, the scourge has been featured in
the news, movies, documentaries, art work. There have also been many
policymakers, prosecutors, investigators and victims denouncing the very
phenomenon; see for example British MP John Mann passionate speech before
Parliament on the subject last year, or the extensive report by former
undercover Interpol agent (Bannon). Indeed it is a secret de Polichinelle. So
the only possible disagreement can be on the scale and systemicity of the
phenomenon.
To honestly decide whether that's
what we are seeing in the Podesta emails, please have a look at this one
example. Look at the invitation at the end of the thread. Ms Luzzatto is
inviting people (among which are John and Mary Podesta) to a farm in
Lovettsville. This is what she says:
We plan to heat the pool, so a swim
is a possibility. Bonnie will be Uber Service to transport Ruby, Emerson, and
Maeve Luzzatto (11, 9, and almost 7) so you’ll have some further entertainment,
and they will be in that pool for sure.
Impossible, you say? They couldn't
possibly be speaking about abusing the children! After all, what
step-grandmother would offer three innocent children up for group abuse?
This is how invitee Drew Littman
answers the invitation:
I've never had an affair, so I pass
the Walter Jones test.
If you aren't aware, Walter B. Jones
has for 20 years been the U.S. Representative for North Carolina's 3rd
congressional district; in DC he's regarded as the absurd caricature of a
do-gooder, i.e. he is a noble man indeed.
Agreed, if that example was the only
one, one could dismiss it as baroque misinterpretation. But there's more, much
more. Let's not even get into the handkerchiefs and codewords - even though
"cheese pizza" is a known euphemism for "child porn" (and
there are abundant examples in the Podesta emails where that term is used in
very strange and out-of-context manners).
How about the fact that John and Tony
Podesta are old friends of Jeffery Epstein, Dennis Hastert and Clement Freud,
three convicted child molesters? Who has so many child rapists as friends? Who
stays friends with child rapists after they're exposed and convicted?
How about the Katy Grannan photos
plastered around the Podestas' mansion, depicting naked teenagers?
How about Tony Podesta writing he's
"very good and a little wired" from being seated next to "the
kids" on an airplane?
How about the underground vault on
the Podestas' property which admittedly allows them to watch "very
complicated video pieces"?
If you are feeling ill-at-ease, that
reaction is honorable. And the worse thing is you haven't yet seen much. But
for more, you'll have to look for it. Indeed one might be breaking statutory
laws by linking to some of the clues Internet sleuths have found in the past
three weeks.
For example, did you know James
Alefantis, listed 49th "most influential" person in DC by GQ, chef
and White House regular, boyfriend of David Brock, owner of Comet Ping Pong,
had an Instagram account filled with references to and depictions of child
abuse and torture? Indeed it's not just the frescoes in his restaurant or the
"artists" he hosts there; it's not even the fact his menu and the
logos of three other iconic businesses next door feature FBI-recognized
pedophilia symbols. No, this is about his own posts, pictures, comments and
friends on social media. Again, you'll have to look it up for yourself. It is
hardly ambiguous. Indeed it is Alefantis who puts the pizza in #Pizzagate.
If that surprises you, did you know
Arun Rao was caught "liking" several of Alefantis' creepiest toddler
Instagram posts? Again, that could be dismissed - only there's all this
context, and the fact Mr Rao is a Assistant US attorney, and charged with
prosecuting child pornography and abuse.
And if you're still not
distinguishing the pattern, did you know that Laura Silsby (Gayler), the woman
caught trying to smuggle thirty-three children out of Haiti (a country where
the Clinton Foundation isn't without controversy), whose release from jail
became a personal matter for Ms Clinton, thereafter became an associate of
MyStateUSA, which changed its name to AlertSense, and which is the one
providing the technology to issue Amber Alerts?
Enough already. If anything I have
proven the legitimacy of the following question:
Is there a systemic pedophilia
problem in Washington DC, as we already suspect there is one in Hollywood?
In terms of national systemicity, the
statistics are eloquent. The International Centre for Missing Children (ICMEC)
estimates that 8 million children are reported missing each year around the
world. Of that number, according to U.S. Department of Justice research, an
estimated 800,000 children will go missing in the United States alone — a rate
of over 2'000 missing children each day — with 466,949 of those cases entered
into the FBI’s National Crime Information Center (NCIC) database in 2014. With
a current child population (aged 0 – 17) of around 74 million in the United
States, the U.S. Department of Justice figures equate to around 1 child in
every 92 going missing in the United States each year.
This looks like a systemic problem
indeed. Childhood disappearances outnumber cancer deaths in the United States
by one third.
Therefore, given the sheer amount of
leaked emails, and the suspected phenomenon's scale and repartition, it is
likely the data dumps (Podesta and other Wikileaks, Guccifer 1/2, DNCLeaks,
etc.) provide some clue to the problem. Therefore, they should be investigated
thoroughly under than particular lens, and suspicions need to be corroborated
with other (and previously) known facts.
So, my fellow journalists, why aren't
you all looking into this? Is it easy for you to dismiss it as confirmation
bias?
I'm not going to answer the question
for you. At least hop on the bandwagon: this is coming out with or without your
help. But remember some moments are defining, in one's career, for one's
conscience.
I'll conclude with two excerpts of
the Munich Declaration of the Duties and Rights of Journalists (kind of our own
Hippocratic Oath).
The responsibility of journalists
vis-a-vis the public has precedence over any other responsibility, in
particular towards their employers and the public power.
[A journalist's duties include]
respecting the truth no matter what consequences it may bring about to him, ...
defending the freedom of information, of commentaries and of criticism, [and]
not suppressing essential information.
... and one question:
If this doesn't matter, what does?
How long
does a promise last?
How long can a lie
be told?
What would I take in exchange
for my soul?
Would I notice when it was
sold?
Wake me up –
wake me up with a slap or a kiss.
There
must be something better than this, ‘cause I don’t see how it can get much
worse.
What do we have to do to send the
river in reverse?
Every man a
crawling kingsnake,
every girl a half a heartbreak,
every woman sold into
shame,
to every son without a name.
Are your
arms too weak to lift?
Another shovel on
the graveyard shift.
Here comes the
flood if you catch my drift.
Where the
things that they promise are not a gift.
If man falls
through the mirror of a lake,
they fish him out quick and they call him a
fake.
Give him all the temptations he
can take –
lift him up high til his bones break.
I thought I
heard somebody laugh.
Look out your
window.
They’re chasing shadows in the
dark.
They’re counting widows.
I felt a sliver of glass.
Saw a cross in splinters.
I felt the truce of spring.
Dig me out of the trench of winter.
So count
your blessings when they ask permission.
To govern with money and superstition.
They tell you it’s all for your own protection.
Til you fear your own reflection.
But the times are passing from
illumination.
Like bodies falling from a
constellation.
An uncivil war divides
the nation.
So erase the
tape, on the final ape, running down creation.
Running down creation.
